Detailed notes (primarily case notes) on the topics of Incorporation of terms and construction, factors vitiating a contract and damages and included are super summaries ideal to take into an open book exam....
The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Contracts 2 Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:
Casebook Summary (Construing the terms and Implied Terms)
Construction
In construing a contract, the parties’ intentions are considered objectively
Pacific Carriers Ltd v BNP Paribas (2004) 218 CLR 451 Relevant Facts: Pacific (P) was asked by NEAT to deliver a cargo of legumes from Australia to India. NEAT sent a letter of indemnity to P in respect of lass that P might suffer in discharging cargo to receivers without Bills of Lading. The latter was signed by NEAT’s bank, BNP (B) who disclaimed liability and merely confirmed the purchaser’s signature. P rejected the letter of indemnity and NEAT asked BNP to sign one without the disclaimer. The bank officer signed and stamped the letter and sent it to NEAT who transmitted it to P. The officer was authorised only to verify signatures on letters of indemnity but this limitation was unknown to P. P suffered loss as a result of having delivered cargo to those without bills of lading. Case History: P sued B in the NSWSC to enforce the indemnity letters (NEAT became insolvent). The trial judge found that signing the indemnity letters represented that NEAT had the financial capacity to honour the obligations under the letter of indemnity. The NSWCA held that NNP was not liable because the officer had neither actual nor ostensible authority to bind BNP to an indemnity. Issue: To what capacity, on true construction of the letter of indemnity, was the bank involved in the transaction Decision and ratio (Joint judgement):
|
---|
Inemnity - > we promise you that if you unload the cargo and there is no bills of lading, we will indemnify you
Two possibilities to construe signature we validate this or we will indemnify
Exclusion Clauses
An exclusion clause is a term of a contract that attempts to either:
Modify the principal obligations arising under a contract of that particular type; or
To limit/exclude liability of a party which would otherwise arise as a result of a breach by that party of his primary obligations to perform the contract in accordance with its terms (The Law of Contract (1987 – Greg and Davis)
In considering whether or not exclusion clauses are effecting – statute (the TPA) must be considered
Before a party can rely on the protection of an exclusion clause it must be shown that:
The clause was incorporated into the contract; and
whether, as a matter of construction, the clause applies to exclude or restrict liability in relation to the issue in dispute
Whether or not the clause applies to the issue in dispute
Darlington Futures Ltd v Delco Aust Pty Ltd (1986) 161 CLR 500 Relevant Facts: The appellant (DF) was a broker dealing on the commodity futures market. They entered into a contract in 12/6/81 with the respondent (DA) under which they were engaged to take part in a form of commodity futures dealing. Without DA’s authority, DF engaged in day trading in the course of which heavy losses were sustained. Case History: DA sued to recover damages for breach of duty in trading futures without authority. The appellant relied on two exclusion clauses: cl 6: which exempted them from liability for losses arising “in any way out of any trading activity undertaken on behalf of the Client whether pursuant to this agreement or not” and cl 7 which limited liability “for or in respect of any claim arising out of or in connection” with the relationship established in the agreement. The trial judge found in favour of the appellant Issue: Whether or not cl 6 protects the appellant from the consequences of what would otherwise be breaches of contract Decision: No, read in context the words plainly refer to trading activity undertaken by the appellant for the respondent with the respondents authority Ratio (joint judgement: Mason, Wilson, Brennan, Deane and Dawson JJ): Their honours first had to deal with the question of what the approach was in construing exclusion clauses
|
---|
Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Contracts 2 Notes.
Detailed notes (primarily case notes) on the topics of Incorporation of terms and construction, factors vitiating a contract and damages and included are super summaries ideal to take into an open book exam....
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get Started