Law Notes Federal Constitutional Law Notes
Cases and materials summary notes based on Blackshield & Williams Constitutional Law (2011), super summaries intended for easy reference in an open book exam and "policy notes" geared towards writing essays. Structure of the cases and materials summary notes are as follows:
Class 1- Fundamentals of Australian Constitutional Law
Class 2&3 - The high Court and Constitutional Interpretation
Class 4 - The High Court and Characterisation
Class 5 - Inconsistency
Class 6&7 - Economics Powers
Cl...
The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Federal Constitutional Law Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:
The CV writers note that the means of resolving conflicts between powers held concurrently by the State and Commonwealth (most of the s 51 powers are), s 109 provides a means of resolving them by saying that Commonwealth laws prevail to the extent of any inconsistency
They also note that s 5 of the Constitution may have fulfilled this function anyway as it provides that CTH laws are “binding on the courts, judges and people…of every part of the Commonwealth”
The other points noted by the CB writers are covered by Latham CJ in Carter v Egg and Egg Pulp Marketing Board (Vic)
S 109 only applies where, apart from its operation, both the CTH and State laws would otherwise be valid
If either is invalid ab initio due to a lack of power, questions under the section do not arise
The word “invalid” cannot be interpreted as meaning as the State law becomes ultra vires – if the CTH law were repealed the State law would become operative (hence take “invalid” to mean “inoperative”)
This is made clear by the idea that the CTH law “shall prevail” – it has superiority and takes effect to the exclusion of the inconsistent state law
The CB writers draw attention to three tests of inconsistency. Inconsistency is present
If it is impossible to obey both – one law requires you to do X and the other one says you must not
R v Brisbane Licensing Court; Ex p Daniell – State referendum of liquor trading hours fixed by State law for the same day as a federal Senate election. The CTH law provided a State referendum could not be held on the same day
If one law purports to confer a legal right/privilege/entitlement and the other purports to take it away or diminish it
Colvin v Bradley Brothers Pty Ltd
CTH: Affirmed that women could be employed to work on certain machines
State: Made it an offence to do so
This is more complex since you have to work out the effect of both laws. Completely reduced it also amounts to a logical contradiction
If the CTH law evinces an intention to ‘cover the field’ and a State law operates in that field (even if there is no direct contradiction). The CTH law has to purport to be “all there is”. It involves asking two questions of which both answers must be in the positive:
Is the CTH law intended to be the exclusive and only law on topic
In answering this the court will consider things like whether for the law to achieve its purpose it is necessary that it is a complete statement of the law
Does the State law operate in the same field
This is hard and requires an assessment of the scope and operation of both laws.
The CB writers recount the origin of the first test as being propounded by Isaacs J and suggested by Starke J as counsel in the earlier case of Whybrow
Clyde Engineering Co Ltd v Cowburn (1926) 37 CLR 466 Facts: State Law: Prescribed ordinary working hours of 44 hours a week (with overtime thereafter) Federal Law: Fixed ordinary hours of duty at 48 hours. John Cowburn relied on the State Act and worked 44 hours. His employer, relying on the CTH Act deducted an amount from his wages. It was possible to comply with both laws by adopting a 44 hour week but the rights of the employer under the federal award were denied by the State and the rights of the worker were denied by the Federal. Isaacs J noted the problem if State law were to prevail – it would put the industries of Australia and the rights of employers/employees under a great state of uncertainty and confusion, constant inequality dictated by warring sectional policy and disrupt inter-State trade.
“If…a competent legislature expressly or impliedly evinces its intention to cover the whole field, that is a conclusive test of inconsistency where another legislature assumes to enter to any extent upon the same field”
|
---|
Ex parte McLean (1930) 43 CLR 472 Facts: The ‘cover the field test’ became authoritative in this case when Dixon J adopted it in this case. Cth Act: - Conciliation and Arbitration Act - a person in breach of an award liable to a penalty not exceeding that which was fixed by the CCA or CCom NSW Act: Masters and Servants Act – any person absenting themselves from a contract of service was liable to a penalty not exceeding 10 Firth, grazier, alleged that McLean, shearer, had neglected to fulfil his contract through incompetence. McLean argued that because both he and Firth were bound by a award made by the CTH Act, the State Act was invalid by s 109. Held: Inconsistency since the same acts were made subject of slightly different penal sanctions Dixon J:
|
---|
Dao v Australian Postal Commission...
Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Federal Constitutional Law Notes.
Cases and materials summary notes based on Blackshield & Williams Constitutional Law (2011), super summaries intended for easy reference in an open book exam and "policy notes" geared towards writing essays. Structure of the cases and materials summary notes are as follows:
Class 1- Fundamentals of Australian Constitutional Law
Class 2&3 - The high Court and Constitutional Interpretation
Class 4 - The High Court and Characterisation
Class 5 - Inconsistency
Class 6&7 - Economics Powers
Cl...
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get Started