Permission to enter onto the land of another (conditions may be attached)
Created expressly or by implication
No consideration / no contract
Revocable at any time for any reason and licensee must leave land within a reasonable time
A contractual right to enter the land of another and to use or occupy it for a particular purpose
Must be a contract with consideration (or by deed)
Can be created by express or implied agreement
Revocation of licence may be breach of contract
No exclusive possession – right to occupy only
Need not be of certain duration
If the licensee breaches the terms of the K, the K can be terminated on normal contractual principles.
Where not in breach the question of revocability is more difficult.
A licence to enter land to exercise a property right over the land or over chattels on the land eg a profit à prendre, easement or a security interest in chattels on the land.
Licence is incidental to an interest and is:
irrevocable
enforceable against third parties, and
assignable to a third party along with the property right to which it is incidental
Lease versus Cont. Licence | |
Property interest (estate) | Not a property interest |
Enforceable against the world | Traditionally enforceable only against licensor |
Right to exclusive possession | Right to occupy the land |
Must be of certain duration | Of certain or uncertain duration |
May be able to get a remedy for wrongful revocation of a contractual licence
Only damages available in CL
Equity may assist if the licensor wishes to stay on the land (ie get specific performance of the contract): in a way this has the effect of the K licence being irrevocable almost as if it is a property interest
Equitable remedies are discretionary and the court will consider the following discretionary factors before awarding
A court will consider the extent to which the continued supervision of the court would be necessary to fulfil the contract.
Whether the K requires personal services or continual cooperation where the relationship of trust has broken down
The mutuality principle states that courts will not decree specific performance in favour of P if it would not also be available to D (so if P’s obligations are not suitable for an order of SP so that SP would be refused to D if he/she applied for SP, SP will also be unavailable for P.
A court may refuse SP if it would cause hardship to D that would not be caused by damages.
The behaviour of P will be relevant to the court in deciding whether to award SP: maxim ‘he who comes to equity must come with clean hands’.If P has breached the contract, this will not necessarily preclude an award of SP, especially if the term breached is inessential.
If P has breached an essential term, an order of SP will be made only in exceptional circumstances, such as where D has contributed to the breach.
Equitable defence of laches: If P has been...