This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Law Notes Contract Notes

Restitution And Remedies Notes

Updated Restitution And Remedies Notes

Contract Notes

Contract

Approximately 300 pages

Contract I notes discuss, in detail, the components behind the formation of a contract under Australian law. Contract II notes follow up from Contract Law I, and thoroughly examine the process of terminating a contract....

The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Contract Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

RESTITUTION AND REMEDIES * * * * Restitution is concerned with preventing unjust enrichment. It is a branch of the law of civil obligations separate from contract and tort. It is subordinate to contract - if there is an effective contract, then the contract will govern the parties' relationship. Recognition of restitution as a separate branch of the law of civil obligations is relatively recent. Aspects of restitution remain unclear and somewhat controversial. The nature of Restitution * Law imposes restitutionary obligations, when one party has been unjustly enriched by the other party. * Unjust enrichment is the unifying element of restitution. * Unjust enrichment can occur in contractual situations, for example: 1. where a contract is proposed but is not concluded, * Brenner v First Artists Management PL [1993] 2 VR 221; or 2. where a contract is terminated before it has been completely performed, or 3. where a contract is not enforceable, * Pavey & Matthews v Paul (1987) 162 CLR 221; or 4. where a contract is held to be void or voidable. Establishing an Entitlement to Restitution: * The law in this area is unclear and unsettled. * Relevant considerations are (approach with caution): 1. Benefit: the defendant must have been enriched; 2. Detriment: that benefit, or enrichment, must have been obtained at the plaintiff's expense; and 3. Unjust factor: the enrichment must be unjust. This is shown by one of the recognised unjust factors which give rise to a right to restitution. 4. Whether the defendant has a recognised defence which permits them to retain the benefit. * Gummow J in Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Ltd placed cautionary note against the use of an 'all embracing theory of restitutionary rights and remedies founded upon a notion of unjust enrichment'. * Majority in Lumbers warned about 'top--down reasoning': 'The application of a framework for analysis expressed only at the level of abstraction adopted in this case, by reference to 'benefit', 'expense' and 'acceptance', coupled with considerations of unconscionability, creates a serious risk of producing a result that is discordant with accepted principle' at [78]

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Contract Notes.