This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Law Notes Contract Notes

Australian Contract Law Notes

Updated Australian Contract Law Notes Notes

Contract Notes

Contract

Approximately 300 pages

Contract I notes discuss, in detail, the components behind the formation of a contract under Australian law. Contract II notes follow up from Contract Law I, and thoroughly examine the process of terminating a contract....

The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Contract Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

FORMATION ................................................................................................................................................................................ 38 CONTRACT THEORY .................................................................................................................................................................. 39 INTENTION ................................................................................................................................................................................. 41 OFFER ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 45 ACCEPTANCE AND CERTAINTY ............................................................................................................................................ 50 CONSIDERATION ....................................................................................................................................................................... 57 FORMALITIES AND ESTOPPEL ............................................................................................................................................. 61 CAPACITY AND PRIVITY ......................................................................................................................................................... 67 EXPRESS TERMS ....................................................................................................................................................................... 75 IMPLIED TERMS ....................................................................................................................................................................... 81 INTERPRETATION OF TERMS AND CONSTRUCTION .................................................................................................... 87 PERFORMANCE OF THE CONTRACT ............................................................................................................................... 103 PAGE 2 LIST OF CASES Intention to be Legally Bound Rose and Frank Co v JK Crompton and Bros Ltd Balfour v Balfour Cohen v Cohen Merritt v Merritt Riches v Hogben Jones v Padavatton Todd v Nicol Wakeling v Ripley Roufos v Brewster Simpkins v Pays Rose & Frank v Crompton Jones v Vernon's Pools Esso Petroleum v Comm Taxation Edwards v Skywards Banque Brussels Lambert SA v Australian National Industries LTD Gate Gourmet Australia Pty Ltd (In Liq) v Gate Gourmet Holding AG PAGE 3 Intend to be bound: clause which indicated they weren't intending to be bound by law Presumption: there is no intention in a domestic relationship Presumption: there is no intention in a domestic relationship Presumption: separated couples are more likely to have intention Presumption: separated couples are more likely to have intention Domestic Relationship: there is no intention between mother and daughter Domestic Relationship: widow invites sister and niece of deceased husband to live with her - there was intention Domestic Relationship: Invited sister and brother--in--law to move to Australia and live with him - there was intention Domestic Relationship: Son--in--law helps out with business deliveries and the goods were damaged en route - there was intention Domestic Relationship: granddaughter and grandmother and paying lodger lived together paying rent and entered a competition for which they paid 1/3 each. Granddaughter refused to pay intention to be bound Honour Clauses Honour Clauses Puffery Ex Gratia Payments Letters of Comfort Letters of Comfort Coogee Esplanade Surf Motel v Cth Administrator of PNG v Leahy Australian Woollen Mills v Cth Cameron v Hogan Baldwin v Everingham Finlayson v Carr Offer Letters of Intent Government contracts Government contracts Voluntary Associations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Associations Presumption: relationship with the Ermogenous v Greek Church is not business - no Orthodox Church intention - PRESUMPTIONS CAN BE REBUTTED AND UNORTHODOX Definition: a statement of the terms upon which the offeror is prepared Nielsen v Dysart Timbers to be bound if acceptance is Ltd communicated while the offer remains alive Knowledge: parties must have Fitch v Snedaker knowledge of the offer, which has to be communicated Who: Offer can be made to the world at large Puffery: exaggeration which is not Carlil v Carbolic Smoke Ball intended to be taken seriously Invitation to Treat: offer to receive offers Agreement: if parties have reached Clarke v Dunraven final agreement, there can be a contract Intention: it was a government Australian Woollen Mills v scheme to promote industry - no Commonwealth intention to be legally bound Puffery: advertisement which Mitchell v Valherie exaggerated benefits of the goods - not misrepresentation Puffery: reasonable person would Leonard v Pepsico not interpret the ad as being factual Information: request for Harvey v Facey information is not an offer or acceptance Information: request for Stevenson Jaques & Co v information is not an offer or McLean acceptance Gibson v Manchester City Invitation to Treat: invitations to Council treat are not offers Advertisements: wine list sent out Grainger and Sons v Gough as an ad was an invitation to treat PAGE 4 Shop Displays: invitations to treat and not offers Shop Displays: the display of a Pharmaceutical Society v product in a store with a price Boots Cash Chemists attached is not sufficient to be an offer Auctions with Reserve: the call for Payne v Cave bids is an invitation to treat AGC (Advances) Ltd v Auctions without Reserve: general McWhirter rule applies (call = invitation) Internet Auctions: a binding contract existed between the two parties as the essential terms were Smythe v Thomas listed on eBay and it wasn't stated that sale was subject to discussion or negotiation (sale of a plane) Pratt Contractors Ltd v Tenders: the call for tenders is an Palmerston North City invitation to treat, but the Council submission is the offer Tenders: the contract is awarded to Harvela v Royal Trust the highest fixed bid (bilateral Company contract) Tender - Collateral Contract: Hughes Aircraft Systems information about the tender was International v Airservices passed to another party - breach of Australia a collateral/process contract Tender - Collateral Contract: Blackpool & Fylde Aero tenders, and requests for tenders Club v Blackpool Borough are accompanied by a collateral Council contract which implies the bid will be inspected MacRobertson Miller Ticket purchase (prior): Issue of Airline Services v the ticket = offer, and when the Commissioner of State passenger takes their seat = Taxation (WA) acceptance Ticket purchase (automatic Thornton v Shoe Lane machine): display of the machine = Parking offer, money placed into the machine = acceptance Termination: an offer is terminated Byrne v Van Tienhoven if it is withdrawn, however revocation must be communicated Termination: termination of the Dickinson v Dodds offer can be in words or in conduct, even by a third party Termination (Option Contract): Goldsborough Mort and Co an offer can be revoked by the v Quinn offeror before communication of acceptance by offeree Fisher v Bell PAGE 5 Acceptance Termination by Death: a contract can still be performed if there is a Carter v Hyde personal element, or else the offer will lapse Termination through Condition Failure: the signature of one co-- Neill v Hewens vendor is not binding without the signature of another - ALL parties must sign Rejection/ Revocation and Unilateral Contracts: breached Mobil Oil v Wellcome contract with dealers - revocation International made it impossible for acceptance to occur Acceptance: must be as a response Crowne v Clarke to and as a result of the offer Counter--Offer: a counter offer is Hyde v Wrench not acceptance Standard Forms: Terms of the Butler Machine Tool Co Ltd buyer were different to the terms of v Ex--Cell--O--Corp (England) the seller. Accepted as a counter Ltd offer as it wasn't the original terms Subject to Contract: finality is Master v Cameron subject to another contract being formed Empirnall Holding v Conduct: acceptance can be Machon Paul Partners conferred through conduct Silence: acceptance is not valid if it Felthouse v Bindley is stipulated by silence Postal Rule: acceptance arises as Adams v Lindsell soon as the letter is posted, NOT recieved Postal Rule: parties must have Henthorn v Fraser contemplated post would be means of communication Postal Rule Exception: parties Bressan v Squires must have stipulated actual receipt of the acceptance letter Postal Rule Exception: Tallerman v Nathan's circumstances of the case - where Merchandise negotiations are complex and highly contentious Instantaneous Communication: Entores Ltd v Miles Far general rule applies to telexes and East telephones, not the postal rule Instantaneous Communication: Brinkibon Ltd v Sahag general rule applies to telexes and Stahl telephones not the postal rule PAGE 6 Reese Bros Plastic Ltd v Hamon--Sobelco Australia Foley v Classique Coaches Ltd Instantaneous Communication: general rule applies to faxes Completeness: need final agreement on all essential terms Completeness: parties/subject matter and price need to be decided Illusory Terms: A term can be implied based on reasonableness regarding the deferral of agreement Completeness: Agreements to agree or negotiate constitute an incomplete contract Certainty: A contract is only legally enforceable if the terms are officially agreed on and certain Illusory Promises: If a promise gives one party an unrestricted discretion, the promise is illusory Illusory Promises: if the promise isn't illusory, the contract provides information as to who should determine important matters Illusory Promises: If the promise isn't illusory, the contract provides an objective criteria for exercise of discretion Illusory Terms: Terms can be implied based on an external standard Illusory Terms: Invalid terms can be severed if the contract can survive without it. Otherwise the contract becomes void Illusory Terms: If a term is for the benefit of one party only, that party can waive the term Definition: Act, or promise of an act which is done in return for a promise Move from the promise: To enforce it, it must be paid for Definition: Valuable consideration must consist of some right, interest, profit or benefit for one party, or a forbearance of the other Definition: Consideration must be paid for to be enforceable Hall v Busst Coal Cliff Collieries P/L v Sijehama P/L G Scammell and Nephew Ltd v HC and JG Ouston Placer Development Ltd v Commonwealth Godecke v Kirwan Meehan v Jones Hillas v Arcos Fitzgerald v Masters Whitlock v Brew Consideration Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre v Selfridge and Co Currie v Misa Parastatidis v Kotaridis PAGE 7

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Contract Notes.