This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Law Notes Civil Procedure Notes

Topic 10 Collecting Evidence Notes

Updated Topic 10 Collecting Evidence Notes

Civil Procedure Notes

Civil Procedure

Approximately 42 pages

Here you will find summarised civil procedure law notes for the entire Monash University topic.

The summary notes are an excellent exam help, with steps to work through problems questions and summaries of cases. They are short enough for use in an exam, but detailed enough that you will never miss a point...

The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Civil Procedure Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

TOPIC 10: METHODS OF GATHERING EVIDENCE

1. Discovery

a) Three steps to discovery:

i. Notice for discovery

  • Discovery is limited to documents that are relevant to a fact in issue in the proceedings as disclosed by the pleadings (r29.02) This relevance test is upheld by R29.01.1

  • It is a solicitor’s duty to be personally satisfied that the client is providing complete discovery. If the solicitor knows that the affidavit of documents is misleading, then they should withdraw.

  • Where pleadings are closed, any of those parties by notice of discovery may require the other party served to make discovery of all documents which are or have been in that party’s possession and which, in accordance with 29.01.1 are required to be discovered, using Form 29A (29.02(2))

    • R29.01.1(3) includes any of the following documents of which the party giving discovery is aware, after a reasonable search, at the time discovery is given:

      • Documents on which the party relies

      • Documents that adversely affect the party’s own case

      • Documents that adversely affect another party’s case

      • Documents that support another party’s case

    • Section 26: Overarching obligation to disclose existence of all documents which are critical to the resolution of the dispute

      • Explanatory Memorandum: critical documents are those ‘that a party would reasonably be expected to have relied on as forming the basis of the party's claim when commencing the proceedings, as well as documents that the party knows will adversely affect the party's case.’

  • Reasonable search: R29.01.1(5) in making a reasonable search a party may take into account-

    1. the nature and complexity of the proceeding;

    2. the number of documents involved;

    3. the ease and cost of retrieving a document;

    4. the significance of any document to be found; and

    5. any other relevant matter.

  • No searching required when unreasonable: 29.04(2) – the party must include in the affidavit of documents a statement of –

    1. The category or class of document not searched for; and

    2. The reason why.

    • If it is considered unreasonable to search for certain documents, the party can simply state why that search has not occurred

  • Relevance does not just mean relevant to the proceeding as framed by the P, but relevant to all the issues in the case. Compagnie Financiere et Commerciale de Pacifique v Peruvian Guano Co


ii. Making discovery – “affidavit of documents”

  • What is a document?

    • s38 Acts Interpretation Act: "document" includes, in addition to a document in writing—

      1. any book, map, plan, graph or drawing;

      2. any photograph;

      3. any label, marking or other writing which identifies or describes anything of which it forms part, or to which it is attached by any means whatsoever;

      4. any disc, tape, sound track or other device in which sounds or other data (not being visual images) are embodied so as to be capable (with or without the aid of some other equipment) of being reproduced there from;

      5. any film (including microfilm), negative, tape or other device in which one or more visual images are embodied so as to be capable (with or without the aid of some other equipment) of being reproduced there from; and

      6. anything whatsoever on which is marked any words, figures, letters or symbols which are capable of carrying a definite meaning to persons conversant with them;

      1. Broad enough to cover information on computers e.g. the hard drive Grant v Marshall and r 29.12

      2. Includes deleted emails that may still be stored on a back-up system, Court may order a forensic expert be given access to a party’s computer for purpose of retrieving documents Sony Music Entertainment (Aust) Ltd v University of Tasmania [2003] FCA 724.

  • PROCESS: You have 42 days to make discovery from notice (r29.03)

    • Within 42 days period, party receiving notice must make discovery by producing a sworn list of documents called an ‘affidavit of documents’. (r29.04)

    • Shall be in the form in Form 29B, to be sworn, filed with Court and a sealed copy served on requesting party.

  • It must: (r29.04)

    1. Identify docs which are or have been in the possession of the party making the affidavit

    2. Enumerate docs in convenient order and describe each doc or group of docs, sufficiently to enable the doc or group to be identified;

    3. Distinguish between docs which are possession from those that no longer are. For any doc which used to be but is not longer in the possession:

      1. State when the party parted with the document; and

      2. The party’s belief as to what has become of it;

    4. Where claiming doc is privileged from production state sufficiently the grounds of the privilege

      • Valid claim to privilege: documents to which the privilege applies need not be produced for inspection and the party may refuse to answer interrogatories directed to privileged information.

      • Legal Professional Privilege: s118 Evidence Act which broadly corresponds to legal professional privilege at common law

        • The law Baker v Campbell.

          1. Confidential communications between a legal adviser and client (does not apply to communication with a solicitor acting outside their professional capacity or one that does not relate to confidential advice)

          2. Communications with a solicitor for the purpose of existing or anticipated litigation. Doesn’t need to have actually commenced so long as there is an apprehension of such litigation (real prospect as distinct from a mere possibility but it does not have to be more likely than not)

        • It will apply to communication which is made for the dominant purpose of obtaining legal services in existing or anticipated litigation in Australia or overseas S119 Evidence Act

        • This privilege is extended to pre-trial processes s131 Evidence Act

      • Privilege against self-incrimination: s128 Evidence Act

      • Privilege against exposure to penalties & forfeiture

      • Public interest

      • Evidence of settlement negotiations

      • Religious confession privilege

      • Journalists source

  • Possession, custody or power

    • A party is only required to discover documents which are or have been in that party’s control in...

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Civil Procedure Notes.