Law Notes Litigation - Criminal Procedure Rules Notes
These notes aim to set out the relevant legal principles, and material facts from cases in order to demonstrate how those legal principles have been applied. Because of how heavily statute-focused this topic is, in some places I've extracted the relevant statute in the text or in a 'comment'.
At the beginning of each document on each topic, there is a table of contents (hyperlinked so you can navigate easily through the document), and also 'checklists', which you can use during revisions or ex...
The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Litigation - Criminal Procedure Rules Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:
Admissibility of admissions:
Note: For q3, where otherwise indicated, the statute cited is EA.
A Prelim issue: What admissions were made? (EA part 3.4 Dictionary)
B For each admission:
Reasonably open to find that the person made an admission: s 88 EA?
Taping requirements of s 281 met?
Applicability of s 86?
Voluntariness? S 84
Reliability? S 85?
Exclusion of improperly or illegally obtained evidence: s 138
What improprieties/contraventions of Aust Law?
Unlawful arrest?
Unlawful searches? (With warrants or without warrants)
Lawful arrest, but suspect detained longer than investigation period? Ss 115-7; Michaels
Lawful arrest, detention warrant, but invalid detention warrant? Application can be made under s 119(1) LEPRA
CM caution detained person, give summary of Part 9 as soon as RP, and request person to sign: s 122(1) LEPRA
Failure to caution, reasonable fluency issues: s 139 EA
Vulnerable person rights under l 24 LEPPR; Campbell?
Right to communicate with friend/relgative/guardian AND lawyer: s 123
Right to communicate with consular official? S 124
Provision of information to friends/relative/guardian (s 126) or person who requests (s 127)
Failure to provide interpreter if detainee cannot communicate with reasonable fluency? S 128 LEPRA
Right to medical attention under s 129?
Right to refreshments under s 130?
Right to custody record under s 131(5) LEPRA?
False statement? S 138(2)(b)
Something likely to impair substantially ability to respond rationally? S 138(2)(a)
Entrapment/subterfuge? Woolworths; Ridgeway (pg 15/25 of 10/11 notes)
Improper use of warrants: Parker
Impropriety? Eg not informing of rights to delay questioning (camm) or questioning during searching premises (Camm) and questioning when near each other (Camm)
Balancing act under s 138(3). Factors to take into account are s 138(3)(a)-(h) factors (Parker).
(a) probative value (b) importance of evidence (c) nature of relevant offence (d) gravity of contravention (e) deliberate or reckless (f) contravention of ICCPR (g) whether action sought in relation to impropriety and (h) difficulty of obtaining evidence
Unfair? S 90
Whether if recorded or not – McKinney warning would be given at trial
The law concerning s 90 is unclear (Em).
What is relevant to unfairness:
Gleeson CJ and Heydon J (majority) suggested and Kirby J in the minority held in...
Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Litigation - Criminal Procedure Rules Notes.
These notes aim to set out the relevant legal principles, and material facts from cases in order to demonstrate how those legal principles have been applied. Because of how heavily statute-focused this topic is, in some places I've extracted the relevant statute in the text or in a 'comment'.
At the beginning of each document on each topic, there is a table of contents (hyperlinked so you can navigate easily through the document), and also 'checklists', which you can use during revisions or ex...
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get Started