This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Law Notes Criminal Laws (JURD7122/1022) Notes

Criminal Laws Notes

Updated Criminal Laws Notes

Criminal Laws (JURD7122/1022) Notes

Criminal Laws (JURD7122/1022)

Approximately 86 pages

These offence tables are essential for the problem question aspect of the Criminal Laws exam.

Presented in a clear, precise and modern format - they are easy to navigate using the contents page and quick reference page numbers.

Each section summarises the particular offence, taking you through the applicable tests (i.e. acts refs, mens read etc) stage by stage in a way that will allow you to quickly answer the problem questions - including other information that will score you bonus points ...

The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Criminal Laws (JURD7122/1022) Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

HOMICIDES)etc.) MURDER& CONSTRUCTIVE&MURDER& MANSLAUGHTER&VOLUNTARY& ASSAULT&CAUSING&DEATH& ASSAULT&CAUSING&DEATH/INTOXICATED& MANSLAUGHTER&INVOLUNTARY& MANSLAUGHTER/CRIMINAL&NEGLIGENCE& DANGEROUS&DRIVING&CAUSING&DEATH& HOMICIDE&BY&OMISSION& && DEFENCES& INSANITY& NON6INSANE&&&INSANE&AUTOMATISM& SUBSTANTIAL&IMPAIRMENT& INFANTICIDE& SELF6DEFENCE& INTOXICATION& EXTREME&PROVOCATION& && ASSAULTS)etc.& COMMON&ASSAULT& ASSAULT&CAUSING&ABH& WOUND&OR&ABH&WITH&INTENT& RECKLESS&GBH&OR&WOUNDING& NEGLIGENT&INFLICTION&OF&GBH& ATTEMPTED&MURDER& DISCHARGING&FIREARM&WITH&INTENT& CAUSING&DOG&TO&GBH/ABH& USE&OF&EXPLOSIVES&TO&CAUSE&INJURY& THROWING&ROCKS/OBJECTS&AT&VEHICLES& ASSAULT/&INTENT&TO&COMMIT&INDICTABLE& ASSAULTS&AT&SCHOOLS&ETC& CHOKE,&SUFFOCATE,&STRANGLE& && SEXUAL/INDECENT)ASSAULTS& SPIKING&FOOD&OR&DRINK& SEXUAL&ASSAULT& AGGRAVATED&SEXUAL&ASSAULT& AGGRAVATED&SEXUAL&ASSAULT/COMPANY& INDECENT&ASSAULT& AGGRAVATED&INDECENT&ASSAULT& ACT&OF&INDECENCY& AGGRAVATED&ACT&OF&INDECENCY& && & & ) 1) 6) 8) 9) 11) 12) 15) 17) 19) )) ) 21) 24) 26) 28) 29) 32) 33) )) ) 37) 38) 39) 40) 41) 42) 43) 43) 44) 44) 44) 45) 45) )) ) 46) 47) 49) 51) 52) 53) 55) 55) )) ) ) LARCENY)etc.& LARCENY& ROBBERY& AGGRAVATED&ROBBERY&& AGGRAVATED&ROBBERY&WITH&WOUNDING& ROBBERY&IN&COMPANY& ROBBERY&WITH&ARMS/WOUNDING& BREAK&AND&ENTER&OFFENCES& RECEIVING&STOLEN&PROPERTY& FRAUD& ) 56) 57) 59) 60) 61) 62) 63) 64) 65) & JO)JOINT)CRIMINAL)ENTERPRISE& JOINT&CRIMINAL&ENTERPRISE& EXTENDED&JOINT&CRIMINAL&ENTERPRISE&& ACCESSORIAL&LIABILITY& ACCESSORIES&AFTER&THE&FACT& CONSPIRACY& ) 67) 69) 70) 75) 77) & JO)SENTENCING& SENTENCING& & ) 79) MURDER& Crimes'Act'1900' Statute& s.&18& 1)! a)&&&Murder&shall&be&taken&to&have&been&committed&where&the&act&of&the&accused,&or&thing&by&him& or& her& omitted& to& be& done,& causing& the& death& charged,& was& done& or& omitted& with& reckless& indifference& to& human& life,& or& with& intent& to& kill& or& inflict& grievous& bodily& harm& upon& some& person,&or&done&in&an&attempt&to&commit,&or&during&or&immediately&after&the&commission,&by&the& accused,&or&some&accomplice&with&him&or&her,&of&a&crime&punishable&by&imprisonment&for&life&or& for&25&years.& b)! Every&other&punishable&homicide&shall&be&taken&to&be&manslaughter.&& & 2)! a)&No&act&or&omission&which&was¬&malicious,&or&for&which&the&accused&had&lawful&&&cause&or& excuse,&shall&be&within&this§ion.& b)! No& punishment& or& forfeiture& shall& be& incurred& by& any& person& who& kills& & & & & another& by& misfortune&only.& & General& Murder&requires:& Principles& 1.! An&act&or&omission&& 2.! Causing&death&& 3.! With&reckless&indifference&or&intent&to&kill&or&commit&GBH&(s&4)&(subjective&test,&actual&person& state&of&mind)&OR&an&attempt&during/immediately&after&a&crime&with&a&punishment&of&25&yrs& to&life&(constructive&murder)& & Burden&of&Proof& Crown&must&prove&BRD&that,&at&the&time&[he/she]&did&the&deliberate&act&which&caused&the&death&of& [the&deceased],&[the&accused]&had&an&intention&to&kill&the&deceased,&or&an&intention&to&inflict&grievous& bodily&harm&upon&[him/her],&or&that&the&act&which&caused&death&was&done&with&reckless&indifference& to&human&life& & Actus&Reus& s.18&1(a):&"where&the&act&of&the&accused,&or&thing&by&him&or&her&omitted&to&be&done,&causing&the&death& charged"& !! An&act&or&omission& !! Voluntariness:&a&voluntary&act&by&the&accused,&a&deliberate&or&willed&act& !! Causation:&the&act&must&cause&the&death&-&the&substantial&and&operating&cause& !! Possibility&of&a&charge&of&attempt&if&person&does¬&die& & & Substantial&and&operating&cause& & Smith'(1959):'QB:&'if&the&original&wound&is&still&an&operating&cause&and&a&substantial&cause&then&the& death&can&properly&be&said&to&be&the&result&of&the&wound;&albeit&that&some&other&cause&of&death&is& operating...only&if&the&second&cause&is&so&overwhelming&as&to&make&the&original&wound&merely&part&of& the&history&can&it&be&said&that&death&does¬&flow&from&the&wound& !! This&test&applied&in&R'v'Grimes'and'Lee'NSW:&The&deceased&jumped&from&train&in&order&to&escape& the&accused&who&had&assaulted&and&robbed&him& & Causation& & Royall'(1991):&If,&at&the&time&of&death,&the&defendant's&act&was&a&substantial&and&operating&cause& of&the&death,&then&the&defendant&will&be&deemed&as&causing&that&death&& & Royall'(1991);'Hallet'[1969]:'This&extends&to&a&situation&where&the&act&of&the&defendant&brought& about&a&further&event&(e.g.&exposing&the&victim&to&a&new&danger,&causing&the&defendant&to&take& certain&actions)&which&actually&caused&his&death&& & 1 Pagett'(1983):&This&also&extends&to&any&acts&done&'involuntarily',&or&in&selfMdefence,&in&response&to& the&defendant's&action&& Hallet'[1969]:&The&chain&of&causation&will&only&be&broken&if&a&completely&coincidental&event&has& occurred,&such&as&an&act&of&god&or&if&the&victim&completely&overreacted&(Royall&(1991)).& & R'v'Smith&[1959]:&If&there&are&additional&wounds&to&the&original&wound,&but&"only&if&it&can&be&said& that&the&original&wounding&is&merely&the&setting&in&which&another&cause&operates&can&it&be&said&that& the&death&does¬&result&from&the&wound...only&if&the&second&cause&is&so&overwhelming&as&to&make& the&original&wound&merely&part&of&the&history&can&it&be&said&that&the&death&does¬&flow&from&the& wound."& & Causation:&Intervening&Acts& & Hallet'[1969]:&Deceased&died&from&drowning;&however&prior&to&this&Hallet&had&assaulted&and& choked&him,&left&him&unconscious&but&moving&on&his&back&with&feet&in&water.& !! Only&if&the&victim&consciously&entered&the&water&could&the&chain&of&causation&be&broken.&The& act&of&the&accused&rendered&the&victim&unconscious&with&violence&which&originated&the&chain&of& causation.&The&tide&coming&in&did¬&break&the&chain&as&it&was&an&ordinary&operation&of&natural& causes& !! Chain&of&causation&could¬&be&broken&by&Hallet's&omission&to&take&further&measures&for&the& safety&of&the&deceased,&even&if&such&omissions&were&contrary&to&his&original&intention&and&were& excused&by&his&inadvertently&falling&asleep.& & Intervening&Act:&Done&in&SelfMPreservation& & R'v'Grimes'and'Lee&(1894):&It&is&enough&that&the&victim's&apprehension&of&danger&is&well_founded& and&reasonable;&there&is&no&requirement&for&the&steps&taken&for&escape&to&be&reasonable.&& ' R'v'Pitts'(1842);&R'v'Pagett'(1983):'A&reasonable&act&performed&for&the&purpose&of&self& preservation&in&attempting&to&escape&the&violence&of&the&accused&does¬&break&the&chain&of& causation.&In&this&context,&'reasonable'&means&reasonable&in&the&light&of&the&accused's&conduct&and& the&apprehension&of&danger&which&it&induced&in&the&mind&of&the&victim.& & Royall&(1991):&Determining&whether&or¬'the&act&of&self&preservation&is&reasonable&turns&on&the& nature&and&extent&of&the&wellMfounded&apprehension&of&lifeMthreatening&violence;&the&intervening& act&does¬&need&to&be&reasonably&foreseeable& & Rik'[2004]:'A&person&in&fear&may&make&a&quick&decision;&whether&the&response&of&the&deceased&was& reasonable&or&proportionate&in&the&circumstances&are&questions&for&the&jury.& & Breaking&the&chain&of&causation:&acts&of&the&deceased& ' Burns'[2012]:&Absent&intimidation,&mistake&or&other&vitiating&factor,&what&an&adult&of&sound&mind& does&is¬&in&law&treated&as&having&been&caused&by&another.& & Blaue'[1975]&Eng&CA& !! Balue&stabbed&victim;&victim&refused&blood&transfusion&at&hospital&due&to&religious&beliefs&"&died& !! TJ& Acquitted& of& murder& on& grounds& of& diminished& responsibility,& convicted& of& manslaughter& +& wounding&w/&intent&to&do&GBH&+&indecent&assault& !! Appealed& manslaughter& conviction;& if& successful,& applied& for& leave& to& appeal& wounding& conviction& !! HELD:&The&fact&that&the&victim&refused&to&transfusion&(knowing&this&would&result&in&her&death)&did& not&break&chain&of&causation;&the&question&was&what&caused&the&death,&the&answer&was&the&stab& wounds.& & 2 Intervening&acts:&medical&treatment& Mens&Rea& & Jordan&(1956):&"palpably&wrong"&medical&treatment&broke&the&chain&of&causation.& & Smith&[1959]:&Victim&suffered&two&bayonet&wounds&inflicted&by&the&accused&[Smith],&one&pierced& his&lung&and&suffered&hemorrhage.&While&being&carried&to&a&medical&station,&he&was&accidently& dropped&twice,&then&given&the&wrong&treatment.&Applied&Jordan'(1956)&M&treatment&by&doctors&did& not&break&chain&of&causation.&& ' Malcherek'and'Steel'[1981]'English:'Disconnecting&life&support&did¬&break&chain;&original&injury& still&operating&cause& ' Cheshire'[1991]:&Considered&what°ree&of&medical&negligence&is&required&to&override&the&original& injury& !! Must&be&"so&independent&of&the&acts&and&in&itself&potent&to&causing&death"& !! Only&reckless,¬&negligent&or&incompetent,&medical&treatment&was&sufficient&to& break&the&chain&of&causation& & Murder&by&Omission& & **See&separate§ion&on&Homicide&by&Omission**& & s.18&1(a)&"was&done&or&omitted&with&reckless&indifference&to&human&life,&or&with&intent&to&kill&or&inflict& grievous&bodily&harm&upon&some&person&or&done&in&an&attempt&to&commit,&or&during&or&immediately& after&the&commission,&by&the&accused,&or&some&accomplice&with&him&or&her,&of&a&crime&punishable&by& imprisonment&for&life&or&for&25&years."& & & !! Intent&to&kill&OR&intent&to&inflict&GBH&(refers&to&the&accused's&actual&state&of&mind&_&subjective)& !! Reckless&indifference&to&human&life&& & INTENTION& & "Intent&and&intention&are&very&familiar&words.&In&the&legal&context&in&which&we&are&considering&them,& they&carry&their&ordinary&everyday&meaning.&A&person's&intention&may'be'inferred'or'concluded'from' the'circumstances'in'which'the'death'occurred'and'from'the'conduct'of'the'accused'person'before,' at'the'time'of,'or'after'he'or'she'did'the'specific'act'which'caused'the'death&of&the&deceased.&In& some&cases,&a&person's&acts&may&provide&the&most&convincing&evidence&of&his&or&her&intention&at&the& time.&Where&a&specific&result&is&the&obvious&and&inevitable&consequence&of&a&person's&act,&and&where& the&person&deliberately&does&that&act,&you&may&readily&conclude&that&he&or&she&did&that&act&with&the& intention&of&achieving&that&particular&result."& (Judicial&Commission&of&NSW,&Criminal&Trial&Courts&Bench&Book)&& & GREVIOUS&BODILY&HARM& & Crimes'Act'1900'(NSW)&s&4:& "Grievous&bodily&harm"&includes:&& (a)&the&destruction&(other&than&in&the&course&of&a&medical&procedure)&of&the&foetus&of&a&pregnant& woman,&whether&or¬&the&woman&suffers&any&other&harm,∧& (b)&any&permanent&or&serious&disfiguring&of&the&person,∧& (c)&any&grievous&bodily&disease&(in&which&case&a&reference&to&the&infliction&of&grievous&bodily&harm& includes&a&reference&to&causing&a&person&to&contract&a&grievous&bodily&disease)."& & !! Any&'really&serious'&injury&will&fall&into&this&category&(DPP&v&Smith&(1961);&Haoui&(2008)&NSWCCA& & 3 RECKLESS&INDIFFERENCE& Penalty& Defences& & & !! If&you&commit&a&fatal&act&knowing&that&it&will&probably&cause&death&you&are&just&as&blameworthy& as&if&you&had&intended&to&murder.&& !! It&is¬&your&indifference&to&the&act&that&constitutes&MR&but&your&knowledge&about&the&probable& consequences.&& & Common&Law:&& & Crabbe'(1985)&-&"It&should&now&be®arded&as&settled&law&in&Australia&that&if&a&person&does&an&act& knowing&that&it&is&probable&that&death&or&GBH&will&result&is&guilty&of&murder.&It&is¬&enough&that&he& does&the&act&knowing&that&it&is&possible&but¬&likely&that&death&or&GBH&might&result"& & In&NSW:&in&Royall'(1991)&the&HC&held&that&the&decision&in&Crabbe&applies&to&the&reckless&indifference& MR&requirement&in&s.18.&BUT,&under&this&legislation&the&prosecution&must&prove&the&accused&foresaw& the& probability& of& death.& Foresight& for& GBH& not& sufficient& MR& for& murder.& In& these& cases& the& defendant&would&be&guilty&of&manslaughter.&Trial&judges&need&to&direct&on&difference&between&intent& and&reckless&indifference&& & POSSIBILITY&/&PROBABILITY& & !! There&is&a&big&difference&between&asking&whether&the&accused&knew&that&death&was&probable&or& if&there&was&a&possibility.& !! A&defendant&is&guilty&of&reckless&indifference&to&human&life&if&s/he&foresaw&the&probability&(as& opposed&to&possibility)&of&his/her&actions&resulting&in&death&(as&opposed&to&grievous&bodily&harm):& Annakin&(1988)&& & IRRELEVANCE&OF&METHOD&CAUSING&DEATH& ' Royall'(1991):&Provided&one&of&the&mental&states&required&for&murder&was&present,&and&test&for& causation&is&satisfied,&it&does¬&matter&that&accused&did¬&intend&the&precise&way&&in&which&the& death&actually&occurred.& & & Mandatory&Life&imprisonment& ' Crimes'(Homicide)'Amendment'Act'1982:&in&limited&circumstances&trial&judge&has&a&discretion&to& sentence&less&than&life&(provocation)& "&Is&"the&person's&culpability&significantly&diminished&by&mitigating&circumstances?"&if&yes,&then& there&is&a&discretion&to&impose&a&lesser&sentence&(manslaughter)& & s&19A:&punishment&for&murder&is&life&imprisonment;&but&& s&21(1)&of&Crimes'(Sentencing'Procedure)'Act'1999'permits&mitigating&factors&to&be&taken&into& account&in&sentencing&_&court&discretion&& & s&19B:&life&imprisonment&for&murder&of&Police&Officer,&in&certain&circumstances&& & Standard&nonMparole&periods:&20&yrs&for&murder,&25&yrs&in&some&instances&(eg&when&victim&a&police& officer&or&under&18&yrs&of&age)& & s&21:&Child&murder&by&motherMverdict&of&contributing&to&death:&10&yrs&imprisonment& & & Partial&Defences&Available:& & 4 **See&separate& section&on& defences&&& defence&table& for&more& detail**& Other&(Policy& Considerations& etc.)& !! Self&Defence&(NB&partial&only&in&case&of&homicide,&complete&defence&for&everything&else)& !! Extreme&Provocation& !! Substantial&impairment&of&abnormality&of&the&mind&& & Complete&Defences&Available:& & !! Insanity&or&mental&illness& !! Insane&Automatism& !! Intoxication& !! Sane&Automatism& & Liability&of&Medical&Profession& & Dyson'[1908]:&if&someone&hastens&a&death,&they&are&responsible&in&law&for&causing&it&& & Adams&[1957]:&If&medical&treatment&could¬&restore&the&health&of&a&terminally&ill&patient,&the& practitioner&was&entitled&to&do&all&that&was&necessary&and&proper&to&relieve&the&patient's&suffering,& even&if&the&measures&taken&incidentally&shortened&the&life&of&the&patient&by&hours&or&longer.&& & St'George's'NHS'Trust'v'S&[1998]:&an&adult&of&sound&mind&entitled&to&refuse&treatment&or&to&have&it& terminated.&& ' Hunter'and'New'England'Health'Service'v'A&[2009]:&Self_determination&prevails&over&the&state's& interest&of&preserving&life.& & R'(Burke)'v'General'Medical'Council'[2006]:&If&a&patient&is&competent&and&opts&for&continued&life_ sustaining&treatment,&then,&at&least&where&this&simply&involves&nutrition&and&hydration,&the& patient's&wishes&must&be&respected.&If&a&doctor&removed&the&artificial&nutrition&and&hydration,&the& doctor&would&be&guilty&of&murder.& & Northridge'v'Central'Sydney'Area'Health'Service&(2000):&recognised&the&parens&patriae&jurisdiction& of&the&NSWSC&"to&act&to&protect&the&right&of&an&unconscious&person&to&receive&ordinary&reasonable& and&appropriate&(as&opposed&to&extraordinary,&excessively&burdensome,&intrusive&or&futile)&medical& treatment,&sustenance&and&support".&This&included&administration&of&antibiotics&and&appropriate& feeding.& & Messiha'(by'his'tutor'Mghdy'Massiha)'v'South'East'Health&[2004]:&The&court&will&defer&to&medical& experts&when&determining&what&is&appropriate&medical&treatment,¬&families.& & Euthanasia& & Currently,&even&in&situations&where&a&person&is&competent&to&make&a&decision&and&consents&to& having&their&life&terminated,&those&who&help&bring&about&their&death&are&guilty&of&homicide&or& aiding&and&abetting&suicide,&depending&on&what&part&they&actually&play&in&the&events&leading&up&to& the&death.&The&consent&of&the&deceased&is&no&defence.&Euthanasia&is&covered&the&Crimes&Act&1900:& & s&31C(1):&'A&person&who&aids&or&abets&the&suicide&or&attempted&suicide&of&another&person&shall&be& liable&to&imprisonment&for&10&years.'&An&offence&under&s&31C(1)&is&committed&where&someone& supplies&the&deceased&with&drugs&designed&to&bring&about&their&death.&& s&31C(2):&& (1)! A&person&who&aids&or&abets&the&suicide&or&attempted&suicide&of&another&person&shall&be& liable&to&imprisonment&for&10&years.&& (2)! Where:&& a)! a&person&incites&or&counsels&another&person&to&commit&suicide,&and&& 5 b)! that&other&person&commits,&or&attempts&to&commit,&suicide&as&a&consequence&of&that& incitement&or&counsel,&the&first&mentioned&person&shall&be&liable&to&imprisonment&for&5& years.& & Justins&[2008]:Victim&had&Alzheimer's&disease;&his&de&facto&provided&the&drug&he&used&to&commit& suicide.&Held&that&if&he&did¬&have&the&capacity&to&commit&suicide&because&of&his&mental&illness,& then&the&accused&caused&his&death&by&making&the&drug&available&to&him.&If&he&had&the&capacity,&then& she&was&neither&guilty&of&manslaughter&or&murder&because&she&had¬&completed&the&actus&reus&of& homicide.& & Airedale'NHS'Trust'v'Bland&[1993]:&Distinguished&discontinuation&of&treatment&from&actively& bringing&a&patient's&life&to&an&end&as&the&law&does¬&authorise&euthanasia.&& & Criminal'Code'Amendment'(Suicide'Related'Material'Offences)'Act'2005&(Cth):& It&is&a&crime&to:&& (a)&to&use&the&internet,&among&other&devices&to&access,&or&distribute&material&that&counsels&or& incites&suicide&or&promotes&or&provides&instruction&on&a&particular&method&of&committing&suicide,& regardless&of&whether&or¬&this&induces&attempts&to&commit&suicide&(s474.29A).&& (b)&produce,&supply&or&possess&material&of&this&kind&with&a&view&to&the&commission&of&an&offence&(s& 474.29A).&& (c)&The&maximum&penalty&is&1000&penalty&units.& & CONSTRUCTIVE&MURDER& Crimes'Act'1900' Statute& s18&1&(a)&Crimes'Act':&If&a&murder&is&committed&"in&an&attempt&to&commit,&or&during&or&immediately& after&the&commission,&by&the&accused,&or&some&accomplice&with&him&or&her,&of&a&crime&punishable& by&imprisonment&for&life&or&for&25&years."& & General&Principles& & Burden&of&Proof& Actus&Reus& Crown&must&identify&the&act&causing&death&and&prove&BRD&that&it&was&a&voluntary&or&willed&act&of& the&accused&or&his&or&her&accomplice.& & Prosecution&does¬&have&to&prove&the&defendant&"realised&death&or&any&other&consequence&was& a&possible&result&of&his&or&her&actions,&or&that&a&reasonable&person&would&have&appreciated&such&a& risk"&(Munro;'Bowden'(1981))&"&the&act&causing&death&still&must&be&voluntary& & The&prosecution&does&NOT&need&to&prove&ill_will&or&premeditation&(malice&aforethought)&to&obtain& a&murder&conviction.&& & In&cases&where&accident&is&no&basis&for&acquittal,&the&burden&is&on&the&accused&will&need&to&raise& the&voluntariness&issue.&An&involuntary&act&will&lead&to&an&accidental&consequence&and&the&easier& line&of&defence&will&be&based&on&a&no&mens&rea&argument.& & & !! Commission&of&an&offence&with&a&max&penalty&of&25&yrs&imprisonment,&where&crime&occurs& during&or&immediately&after,&causing&death.& & Examples:&& *! s&33:&Wounding&with&intent&to&cause&GBH& *! s&33(2):&Wounding&with&intent&to&resist&arrest& *! s&33A(2)&Discharging&a&firearm&with&intent&to&resist&arrest&& *! s&61JA:&Aggravated&sexual&assault&in&company& 6

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Criminal Laws (JURD7122/1022) Notes.