This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Law Notes Business Associations I Notes

Directors’ Duty To Avoid Conflicts Notes

Updated Directors’ Duty To Avoid Conflicts Notes

Business Associations I Notes

Business Associations I

Approximately 213 pages

This is regarded as one of the most difficult core subjects for Law. These notes are comprehensive and easy to understand. They also include comments from the lecturer about the core parts of the course. These notes will give you the time to understand the concepts behind Business Associations because they cut down the time that it takes for you to complete your readings....

The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Business Associations I Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

Class 13 Directors’ duty to avoid conflicts

Corporations Act ss 182, 183.

CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 182

Use of position--civil obligations

Use of position--directors, other officers and employees

(1) A director, secretary, other officer or employee of a corporation must not improperly use their position to:

(a) gain an advantage for themselves or someone else; or

(b) cause detriment to the corporation.

Note: This subsection is a civil penalty provision (see section1317E).

(2) A person who is involved in a contravention of subsection(1) contravenes this subsection.

Note 1: Section79 defines involved .

Note 2: This subsection is a civil penalty provision (see section1317E).

CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 183

Use of information--civil obligations

Use of information--directors, other officers and employees

(1) A person who obtains information because they are, or have been, a director or other officer or employee of a corporation must not improperly use the information to:

(a) gain an advantage for themselves or someone else; or

(b) cause detriment to the corporation.

Note 1: This duty continues after the person stops being an officer or employee of the corporation.

Note 2: This subsection is a civil penalty provision (see section1317E).

(2) A person who is involved in a contravention of subsection(1) contravenes this subsection.

Note 1: Section79 defines involved .

Note 2: This subsection is a civil penalty provision (see section1317E).

Redmond [7.340]-[7.380].

  • The director’s fiduciary obligation includes the duty to avoid situations where without the consent of the company, the director’s personal interest conflicts or possibly conflicts with their duty to run the company.

  • The interest that attracts the statutory disclosure obligation in s 191(1) must be both personal and material.

  • Not limited to pecuniary interest. Personal interests may include interests arising from close personal relationships especially family relationships [R v District Council of Victor Harbour; Ex parte Costain Australia Ltd (1983)],

  • The standard of materiality in related contexts looks to the showing of a substantial likelihood that, under all the circumstances, the interest would have assumed actual significance in the deliberations.

  • Where the director of another company which is contracting with the public company, the materiality would ordinarily be satisfied so that disclosure is required.

  • Generally for purposes of disclosure, an interest need not be director but may be held through intermediate companies in which a controlling interest is held.; Devereaux Holdings Pty Ltd v Pelsart Resources NL (unreported, 1985)

  • Main Principles

    • Chan v Zachariah: A person in a fiduciary relationship cannot put himself in a position where his interests and duty conflict. This prevents a person from being swayed by personal interests and misusing his position. This includes positions where there is a “significant possibility” of conflict.

[7.360] Aberdeen Railway Co. v Blaikie Bros (1854):

  • A director should not enter into engagements in which he has or can have a personal interest conflicting, or which may conflict, with the interests of those whom he is bound to protect.

Scenario

Frieda owns the property so she wants the highest price but being director she would want the lowest price for the land.

It doesn’t matter what price it is being sold for – do not consider the price.

The mere fact that she is just the one – makes the resolution invalid and the transaction voidable.

The remedy is restitution

Curing Conflict: Disclosure of the Interest

  • Where the director discloses the interest and abstains from voting, depending on the articles, this will usually be sufficient to avoid an equitable breach.

Material personal interest:

  • S191(1): A director who has a material personal interest in a matter that related to the affairs of the company must give the other directors notice of the interest unless s191(2) states otherwise.

  • S191(2): When notice is not required

  • R v District Council of Victor Harbour: A personal interest includes but is not limited to a pecuniary interest; it may arise from close personal relationships.

Notice requirements:

  • S191(3)(a): The notice required by s191(1) must give detail of (i) the nature and extent of the duty and (ii) the relation of the interest to the affairs of the company; AND

  • S191(3)(b): Be given at a directors meeting as soon as practicable after the director becomes aware of their interest in the matter.

  • Gray v New Augarita Porcupine Mines: The amount of detail disclosed in the notice must depend on the nature of the contract or arrangement proposed and the context in which it arises.

Effect of disclosure (Proprietary Companies only):

  • s194: If a director has a material personal interest and

  1. discloses the nature and extent of it (per s191) or

  2. doesn’t need to disclose (per s191(2)), then

  3. s/he may vote on matters that relate to the interest and

  4. any transactions relating to the interest may proceed. Also,

  5. the director may retain benefits under the transaction and

  6. the company cannot avoid transaction because of the existence of the interest.

Restrictions on Voting (Public Companies only):

  • s195: A director of a public company who has a material personal interest in a matter that is being considered at a directors’ meeting must not:

  1. be present while the matter is considered at the meeting, or

  2. vote on the matter

  • These restrictions will not apply if interest is exempt under s191(2) (s195(1A)(b)) or directors pass a resolution identifying the director, nature and extent of interest and its relation to the affairs of the company (s195(2)(a)) and the directors are satisfied that the interest should not disqualify the director from voting or being present (s195(2)(b)).

Who should disclosure be made to:

  • Imperial Mercantile, Transvaal: Where provided, full disclosure to the board may be sufficient.

  • Qld Holdings: In other circumstances, full disclosure to a disinterested...

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Business Associations I Notes.