This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more
New Year, New Deals! Start 2025 with 20.25% off—use code NEW YEAR and be one of the first 20 to save!

Contracts - LAWS1075 - Contract Law

Notice: PDF Preview
The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our LAWS1075 - Contract Law Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting.
See Original
1/1 of 46

Introduction to Express Terms - 3 -

Written Terms and Signature - 3 -

From Notice - 3 -

Identifying terms in an electronic contract - 4 -

Breakdown - 4 -

Identifying Express Terms - 4 -

Parol Evidence Rule - 4 -

From Statements Made - 6 -

Incorporation by a course of dealing - 6 -

Interpretation of the Express terms - 7 -

The use of extrinsic material - 7 -

Parol Evidence Rule and Construction - 8 -

The process of interpretation - 8 -

Exclusion Clauses - 9 -

Implied Terms - 9 -

In Law or In Fact or From Custom - 9 -

Implied by custom (impossible to prove) - 10 -

Implied by fact (Byrne v Australian Airlines; Frew v Australian Airlines) - 10 -

Implied by statute/law - 10 -

Australian Consumer Law - 11 -

Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) sched 2 - 11 -

Termination - 13 -

By Agreement - 13 -

Termination by subsequent agreement - 13 -

Express agreements - 13 -

Termination inferred from subsequent agreement - 14 -

Termination by abandonment - 14 -

Breach - 14 -

For Breach of a Condition - 14 -

For Breach on an Intermediate Term - 15 -

For Repudiation - 16 -

Termination for failure of a contingent condition - 17 -

Termination for Delay - 19 -

Restrictions on Termination - 20 -

Consequences of Affirmation/termination - 20 -

Ready and Willing - 21 -

Election - 21 -

Estoppel and Waiver - 22 -

Outline of an answer on Termination - 22 -

Frustration - 23 -

Frustration - 23 -

Law Against Unfair and Unjust Contract Terms - 23 -

Damages for Breach of Contract - 26 -

Types of Damages - 26 -

Map of the General Principles - 27 -

The Compensation Principle - 27 -

Expectation Damages – Compensation - 27 -

Loss of Chance - 28 -

Reliance Damages - 28 -

Gain-based Damages - 28 -

Limitations to Recovering Damages - 29 -

Causation and Remoteness - 29 -

Mitigation - 29 -

Issues when assessing damages - 29 -

Agreed Remedies and Penalties - 30 -

Actions for Debt - 33 -

Vitiating Factors - 34 -

Vitiating Factors and Rescission - 34 -

Mistake - 37 -

General law misrepresentation - 38 -

Misleading or Deceptive Conduct under Statute - 40 -

Duress - 42 -

Undue Influence - 43 -

General Law Unconscionable Dealing - 43 -

Statutory Prohibitions on Unconscionable Conduct - 44 -

Third Party Liability - 44 -

Specific Performance - 44 -

  • Terms of a contract determine what the parties have agreed to do by way of performance to their contract

  • The objective approach in assessing parties’ intentions:

    • “the intention which reasonable persons would have had if placed in the situations of the parties” (Reardon Smith Line v Hansen-Tangen)

  • What are the terms of a contract?

    • The provisions and obligations of the contracts – find them

    • The scope of the performance that is necessary

    • What damage was caused by the breach of contract

  • Express terms may be incorporated:

    • By signature

    • By adequate notice

    • By a course of dealing

    • Under the principle established in the ticket cases

  • Statements made orally during negotiations may also be incorporated into a contract

  • Written terms and the effect of signature

    • General rule (L’estrange v Graucob; Toll (FGCT) v Alphapharm)

      • A party will be bound by the terms contained in a contractual document which they have signed, irrelevant of if they’ve read the document

    • The agency issues

      • A method of overcoming the requirements of privity in a commercial context

  • Circumstances in which the effect of signature may be avoided

    • The rule in L’estrange v Graucob does not apply where the signature was induced by misrepresentations of the nature or scope of obligation, or fraud, or in some cases of mistake

    • Also, where the document cannot reasonably be considered a contractual document, for instance if it appears to have another function, like a receipt (Curtis v Chemical Cleaning & Dyeing)

    • Nonesfacto (latin: this is not my document) – it is clear that someone cannot read a document

  • Incorporation of terms by notice

    • It is not uncommon for one party to allege that the contract contains terms which have been displayed or delivered before or at the time of the transaction

    • Whether or not the party will be bound depends upon whether:

      • The terms were available to the party to be bound by those terms before the contract was made

      • Reasonable steps were taken to bring the terms to the notice of the party to be bound

  • Timing

    • For delivered or displayed terms to form part of a contract they must be available to the party to be bound before the contract is made (Oceanic Sun Line Special Shipping Company v Fay)

  • Knowledge or Notice (Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking)

    • If the timing requirement is satisfied, a party will be bound by delivered or displayed terms if they have either knowledge or reasonable notice of the terms

    • If a party knows that the relevant document contains contractual terms, they will be bound by those terms

    • In the absence of knowledge, a party will be bound by delivered or displayed terms if they had reasonable notice of the terms

    • Reasonable notice depends on the type of contract

  • Was notice given? Was it adequate timing before formation?

  • Electronic Transaction Act 2000 (NSW)

    • Signatures

      • A method is used to identify if a person and to indicate the persons intention in respect of the information communicated

      • The method used was either:

        • As reliable as appropriate for the purposes for which the electronic communication was generated or communicated

        • Proven to the fact to have fulfilled the functions described in paragraph A (above)

      • The person to whom the signature is required to be given consents to that requirement being met by the way of the use of the method mentioned in paragraph a

  • Identify the terms

    • Express terms written document, displayed terms of use

    • Implied terms

  • Written documents

    • Consider the method of incorporation of terms?

      • By signature

        • Is it a contractual document?

      • By notice (if the document is not contractual)

        • Is the notice sufficient?

          • Timing - For delivered or displayed terms to form part of a contract they must be available to the party to be bound before the contract is made (Oceanic Sun Line Special Shipping Company v Fay)

          • Knowledge - a party will be bound by delivered or displayed terms if they have either knowledge or reasonable notice of the terms (Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking)

    • Includes reference of other terms

      • Oral agreements, additional documents, advertising promises

    • Is the contract conclusive?

      • No oral statements and extrinsic material is included

  • What is meant by parol evidence everything that is not the document

  • What is the rationale of the rule? to give effect to the intentions of the parties

  • What is the parole evidence rule? a circle statement

    • If the contract is whole in writing, then extrinsic material cannot be used

    • Therefore, the PER does not apply (State railway Authority)

  • Statements made during negotiations

    • Parties negotiating a contract may make statements about matters relating to the contract

    • If one of the statements is false, the party to whom it was made can seek legal remedy

    • Promissory: and this a term of the contract, then there will be a remedy for breach of contract

    • Representation: not part of the contract, relief must be sought under the law relating to misrepresentation

    • To determine if a statement proves part of a contract:

      • Consider whether evidence of the purported term is admissible to the court

        • Parole evidence rule limits the extent to which extrinsic evidence is available to “add to or vary” the terms of a contract

      • Courts must determine if parties would have intended the statement to form part of the contract.

  • Entire agreement clauses

    • Parties may expressly clarify their intention for a contract to be wholly in writing through a merger or entire contract clause

    • Which states that the written contract contains the entire agreement of the parties

    • Therefore, the PER does not apply because all the terms are in the contracts written document and cannot rely on extrinsic material

  • The parol evidence rules

    • The evidence available to the court will be important in identifying the terms that form part of the contract and the construction given to those terms

    • Common law: regards contracts that the parties have reduced to writing as being in a special category, and severely limits the kind of evidence outside the written document

    • Consists of two parts:

      • It prevents extrinsic evidence being given to add to, vary or contradict the terms of the contract – the ambit of the contract

      • Limits the evidence that might be given to explain the meaning of those terms

  • Evidence included

    • Any evidence extrinsic to the contract

    • In writing

    • Oral conversation

    • Letters

    • Early drafts

  • Can extrinsic evidence be used to determine whether a contract is wholly in writing? (Corbin on contracts; state railway authority of NSW v Health Outdoor)

    • The parol evidence rule only applies to contracts wholly in writing

    • Therefore, will not apply to exclude evidence of the oral terms of a contract that are only partly in writing

  • Exceptions to the parol evidence rule in identifying terms – Cases in which extrinsic material is admissible

    • Collateral contracts

      • What is a collateral contract?

        • A collateral contract is a contact the consideration for which is entry into another contract (Mann v Nunn)

        • Specific type of contract that is the entry into another agreement

        • EG looking for an apartment but the oven is broken and the guy showing the apartment says that hell...

Unlock the full document,
purchase it now!
LAWS1075 - Contract Law
Target a first in law with Oxbridge

More Laws1075 Contract Law Samples